[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150127164302.2b2cc3e0@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:43:02 +0200
From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Amir Vadai' <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Or Gerlitz" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/10] net/mlx4_core: Fix struct mlx4_vhcr_cmd
to make implicit padding explicit
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:38:28 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
> Haven't you broken communication between an old and new
> 32bit Guests and 32bit hosts (assuming they exist)?
Yes, but I don't see any interest on the net in running 32-bit Hosts
with virtualization and SR IOV. I do see that there is interest in
running 32-bit Guests over 64-bit Hosts (which configuration KVM
supports).
Since this change is *required* for supporting 32-bit Guests on 64-bit
Hosts, I don't see that we have much choice here.
As you say, an old 32-bit Host will not be compatible with a new 32-bit
guest, and vice-versa. However, I would assume that almost all Hosts
would have 64-bit architectures, because of the performance and
memory-space requirements for running SRIOV and virtualization.
Therefore, I don't see this as a stopper.
-Jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists