netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: tcp: tcp_v6_send_response() should give an owner to skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1422567096.21689.29.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:31:36 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: tcp: tcp_v6_send_response() should give
 an owner to skb

On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 13:18 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 05:57 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > 
> > RST packets and ACK packets sent on behalf of TIME_WAIT sockets
> > do not have a socket owner currently.
> ...
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > ---
> 
> Please do not apply.
> 
> I forgot about commit 3a7c384ffd57ef5fbd95f48edaa2ca4eb3d9f2ee
> ("ipv4: tcp: unicast_sock should not land outside of TCP stack")
> 
> I need to do this in another way.

Well, no, patch was fine, sorry for the noise.

I have to addresss ipv4 side.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html