[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C9A600.9080004@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:16:16 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: A problem about ICMP packet-too-big message handler
On 2015/1/28 20:10, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:58:53PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My kernel is 3.10 LTS.
>>
>> I got a problem here about handling ICMP packet-too-big message.
>>
>> Before sending a packet-too-big packet :
>>
>> # ip -6 route list table local
>> local ::1 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::1 dev lo metric 0 //It does not have expire value
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:2 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456 dev lo metric 0
>>
>>
>> After sending a packet-too-big packet
>>
>> ip -6 route list table local
>> local ::1 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80:: dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::1 dev lo metric 0 expires _597_ //It has expire value
>
> Is this route still present after the expiration time is elapsed?
>
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:0 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::200:ff:fe00:2 dev lo metric 0
>> local fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456 dev lo metric 0
>>
>> When time is up, I can't ping fe80::1 .
>> Is it ok or a bug ?
>
> This looks pretty similar to a bug I discovered recently.
> In my case, a ipv6 host route dissapeared 10 minutes after
> a PMTU event. As a result, this host was not reachable
> anymore.
>
> This happens because we don't clone host routes before
> we use them. If a PMTU event happens, the original route
> is marked with an expire value. After the expiration time
> is elapsed, the original route is deleted and we loose
> conectivity to the host.
>
> I'm currently testing patches to fix this. With these
> patches the ipv6 host routes are cloned if they are
> gateway routes, i.e. if PMTU events can happen.
>
> I fear it will not fix your case because PMTU events are
> not expected to happen at local fe80 routes.
I found current kernel will do ip6_update_pmtu() anyway after
receiving an ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG type packet in icmpv6_err().
Does it need some more condition ? Like this:
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index a5e95199585e..7c0a28add109 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -89,8 +89,10 @@ static void icmpv6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
/* icmpv6_notify checks 8 bytes can be pulled, icmp6hdr is 8 bytes */
struct icmp6hdr *icmp6 = (struct icmp6hdr *) (skb->data + offset);
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
+ const struct ipv6hdr *iph = (struct ipv6hdr *) skb->data;
- if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG)
+ if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG &&
+ !(ipv6_addr_type(&iph->daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL))
ip6_update_pmtu(skb, net, info, 0, 0);
else if (type == NDISC_REDIRECT)
ip6_redirect(skb, net, skb->dev->ifindex, 0);
Regards,
Yang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists