[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A2BAEFC30C8FD34388F02C9B3121859D1C3687B8@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:13:46 +0000
From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: remove sock_iocb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David Miller
> Sent: January-29-15 3:01 AM
> To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
> Cc: hch@....de; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove sock_iocb
>
> From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:57:21 +0000
>
> > You know, that's getting _really_ interesting. The thing is, now
> > there's only one ->sendmsg() instance using iocb argument at all, and
> > it's a really weird one. TIPC. Which only compares it with NULL, and
> > that - to tell the normal calls (== done by sock_sendmsg()
> > et.al.) from tipc_{accept,connect}()-generated ones. And the way it's
> > used is
> > if (iocb)
> > lock_sock(sk);
> > in tipc_send_stream(). IOW, "tipc_accept() and tipc_connect() would
> > like to use the guts of tipc_send_stream(), but they are already
> > holding the socket locked; let's just pass NULL iocb (which
> > net/socket.c never does) to tell it to leave the fucking lock alone, thank you
> very much".
> >
> > And no ->recvmsg() are using iocb at all now. How about we take the
> > guts of tipc_send_stream() into a helper function and have
> > tipc_accept/connect use _that_?
Sounds reasonable. We'll look into this.
///jon
Then we could drop iocb argument
> > completely and for ->sendmsg() it would be the difference between 4
> > and 3 arguments, which has interesting effects on certain register-starved
> architectures...
> >
> > While we are at it, size (both for sendmsg and recvmsg) is always
> > equal to iov_iter_count(&msg->msg_iter), so that's not the only
> > redundant argument there...
>
> No objections from me.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body
> of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists