| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87h9v8zkuh.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:19:50 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Troy Tan <troy_tan@...lsil.com.cn>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] rtlwifi: btcoexist: Add routines for RTL8812AE kernel socket communications
Hi,
I'm adding bluetooth list to the discussion. Full patch is available
here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5712591/
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net> writes:
> From: Troy Tan <troy_tan@...lsil.com.cn>
>
> This patch adds the routines used to communicate between the RTL8812AE (wifi)
> device and the RTL8761AU (bluetooth) device that are part of the same chip.
> Unlike other similar dual-function devices, this chip does not contain special
> hardware that lets the firmware pass coexistence info from one part to the
> other. As a result, this driver implements such communication as a kernel
> socket.
>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Tan <troy_tan@...lsil.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
> ---
> V2 - Add comments explaining the routine that sends a message via the
> socket.
The commit log is not still explaining that much about the actual
functionality, so I investigated on my own:
> +static u8 rtl_btcoex_create_kernel_socket(struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv,
> + u8 is_invite)
> +{
> + struct bt_coex_info *pcoex_info = &rtlpriv->coex_info;
> + s8 kernel_socket_err;
> +
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL,
> + "%s CONNECT_PORT %d\n", __func__, CONNECT_PORT);
> +
> + if (!pcoex_info) {
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL, "coex_info: NULL\n");
> + return _FAIL;
> + }
> +
> + kernel_socket_err = sock_create(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0,
> + &pcoex_info->udpsock);
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL,
> + "binding socket, err = %d\n", kernel_socket_err);
> +
> + if (kernel_socket_err < 0) {
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL,
> + "Error during creation of socket error:%d\n",
> + kernel_socket_err);
> + return _FAIL;
> + }
> + memset(&pcoex_info->sin, 0, sizeof(pcoex_info->sin));
> + pcoex_info->sin.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + pcoex_info->sin.sin_port = htons(CONNECT_PORT);
> + pcoex_info->sin.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
> +
> + memset(&pcoex_info->bt_addr, 0, sizeof(pcoex_info->bt_addr));
> + pcoex_info->bt_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + pcoex_info->bt_addr.sin_port = htons(CONNECT_PORT_BT);
> + pcoex_info->bt_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
> +
> + pcoex_info->sk_store = NULL;
> +
> + kernel_socket_err =
> + pcoex_info->udpsock->ops->bind(pcoex_info->udpsock,
> + (struct sockaddr *)&pcoex_info->sin,
> + sizeof(pcoex_info->sin));
> + if (kernel_socket_err == 0) {
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL,
> + "binding socket success\n");
> + pcoex_info->udpsock->sk->sk_data_ready =
> + rtl_btcoex_recvmsg_int;
> + pcoex_info->sock_open |= KERNEL_SOCKET_OK;
> + pcoex_info->bt_attend = false;
> + BTC_PRINT(BTC_MSG_SOCKET, SOCKET_CRITICAL,
> + "WIFI sending attend_req\n");
> + rtl_btcoex_sendmsgbysocket(rtlpriv, attend_req,
> + sizeof(attend_req), true);
> + return _SUCCESS;
So the wireless driver communicates with the bluetooth driver (which is
not in upstream) via a localhost UDP connection?
> +#define CONNECT_PORT 30000
> +#define CONNECT_PORT_BT 30001
And these are the UDP ports used.
> +struct hci_link_info {
> + u16 connect_handle;
> + u8 incoming_traffic_mode;
> + u8 outgoing_traffic_mode;
> + u8 bt_profile;
> + u8 bt_corespec;
> + s8 bt_RSSI;
> + u8 traffic_profile;
> + u8 link_role;
> +};
> +
> +#define MAX_BT_ACL_LINK_NUM 8
> +
> +struct hci_ext_config {
> + struct hci_link_info acl_link[MAX_BT_ACL_LINK_NUM];
> + u8 bt_operation_code;
> + u16 current_connect_handle;
> + u8 current_incoming_traffic_mode;
> + u8 current_outgoing_traffic_mode;
> +
> + u8 number_of_acl;
> + u8 number_of_sco;
> + u8 current_bt_status;
> + u16 hci_ext_ver;
> + bool enable_wifi_scan_notify;
> +};
[...]
> +enum HCI_STATUS {
> + /* Success */
> + HCI_STATUS_SUCCESS = 0x00,
> + /* Unknown HCI Command */
> + HCI_STATUS_UNKNOW_HCI_CMD = 0x01,
> + /* Unknown Connection Identifier */
> + HCI_STATUS_UNKNOW_CONNECT_ID = 0X02,
> + /* Hardware Failure */
> + HCI_STATUS_HW_FAIL = 0X03,
> + /* Page Timeout */
> + HCI_STATUS_PAGE_TIMEOUT = 0X04,
> + /* Authentication Failure */
> + HCI_STATUS_AUTH_FAIL = 0X05,
> + /* PIN or Key Missing */
> + HCI_STATUS_PIN_OR_KEY_MISSING = 0X06,
> + /* Memory Capacity Exceeded */
> + HCI_STATUS_MEM_CAP_EXCEED = 0X07,
> + /* Connection Timeout */
> + HCI_STATUS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT = 0X08,
> + /* Connection Limit Exceeded */
And here's part of the information exchanged between the drivers.
This is something which needs to be properly reviewed both in wireless
and bluetooth lists, a wireless driver cannot just invent these on their
own. And using UDP sockets for this is in my opinion just horrible.
I know there's a general need for something similar like this, but it
needs to properly discussed and designed.
Comments?
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists