netdev - Is sch_teql still useful?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NDfn705P0OrgpMfx7nbsNcHh-cXrPVQezG9WtH1Ya3Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:32 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Is sch_teql still useful?

Hi,

Since we have bonding alb, is it still needed to have sch_teql since
they do the same thing, load balancing over multiple interfaces? Also
sch_teql mixes netdevice with qdisc, which somewhat breaks the
abstraction?

I don't dig the history so I could easily miss something here.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html