lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 1 Feb 2015 05:04:44 +0000
From:	"Zayats, Michael" <michael.zayats@...com>
To:	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: AF_NETDEV - device specific sockets

More specific example would be when NIC performs certain fast path processing, 
while punting to the CPU for a slow path.
Slow path would be interested to know the punt reason.

Another example would be if specific NIC strips S-tag in QinQ case and would like to communicate the stripped 
Tag to the client. 

There might be many types of custom functionality, agreed between the NIC and the clients, 
which is not generic or not practical enough for inclusion in the kernel.

That's why I am looking for a generic, socket like mechanism of device<->client, packet + metadata communication,
which wouldn't require core kernel modification.

Thanks,

Michael





-----Original Message-----
From: John Fastabend [mailto:john.fastabend@...il.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 8:41 PM
To: Zayats, Michael
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AF_NETDEV - device specific sockets

On 01/31/2015 08:20 PM, Zayats, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a generic mechanism that would allow network device 
> drivers to provide socket interface to user and kernel space clients.
>
> Such an interface might be used to provide access to important 
> sub-streams of packets, alongside with device specific packet 
> metadata, provided through msg_control fields of recv/sendmsg.
>
> RX Metadata might include device specific information, such as queuing 
> priorities applied, potential destination interface in case of 
> switching hardware etc.
>
> On the transmission, metadata might be used to indicate hardware 
> specific required optimizations, as well as any other transformation 
> or accounting required on the packet.
>
> AF_PACKET based mechanism doesn't allow metadata to be exchanged 
> between the client and the device driver. Extending it would require 
> extending of sk_buff and potentially additional per packet operations. 
> Generic Netlink is not intended to pass packets.
>
> As I am trying to validate generic applicability of such a mechanism, 
> I see that TUN driver is providing custom socket interface, in order 
> to deal with user information through msg_control. Only usable inside 
> the kernel, through custom interface.

> Proposed interface
> ------------------
> Kernel side:
> (struct proto *) should be added to struct net_device.
> Device driver that is interested to support socket interface would populate the pointer.
>

> User space: After creating AF_NETDEV socket, the only successful 
> operation would be setting SO_BINDTODEVICE option. Once set, all 
> socket operations would be implemented by calling functions, that are 
> registered at struct proto on the appropriate net_device.
>
> What do you think?
> Would you see a better approach?
> Some other mechanism that already exists for such a purpose?

It might help to come up with specific examples but an alternate proposal would be to use skb->priority field and then mqprio to steer the traffic to a specific queue and then bind attributes to the queue.

For example the NIC offloaded QOS can be mapped on to queues and then sockets mapped to the queues.

Another example would be to forward all traffic from one queue to a virtual fuction in SR-IOV use case. We don't have an interface to do this but I have been working on an API that could be used for this.

In this case you don't need to modify AF_PACKET interface but configure the device correctly. If you need per-packet control you could use 'tc' or 'nftables' to do the steering.

.John

-- 
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists