[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F54AEECA5E2B9541821D670476DAE19C2B89A551@PGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:49:01 +0000
From: "Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Ahmad, Josef" <josef.ahmad@...el.com>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] stmmac: pci: add MSI support for Intel Quark
X1000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.logic@...us-software.ie]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:50 PM
> To: Andy Shevchenko
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Kweh, Hock Leong; davem@...emloft.net;
> Ahmad, Josef
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] stmmac: pci: add MSI support for Intel Quark
> X1000
>
> On 02/02/15 15:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 15:17 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > > Hi guys.
> > >
> > > Has the issue with PVM masking been addressed ?
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/221
> > >
> > > If not then please drop MSIs from this patchset.
> >
> > I do not see the reason why it should be done on per driver basis.
>
> Agree.
>
> > Care to fix this under arch/x86 then when adding new Quark platform?
>
> Looking into that now.
>
> Hmm - OK -let's aim to get a fix in for the bridge and leave the MSI enable in
> place.
>
I am also agreeing on that. Thanks.
Regards,
Wilson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists