[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D27D68.7040501@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 23:13:28 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
'Chen Gang S' <gang.chen@...rus.com.cn>,
"marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"gustavo@...ovan.org" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead
of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit()
Hello.
On 02/04/2015 02:59 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> -static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
>> +static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
>> {
>> return *((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) & ((__u32) 1 << (nr & 31));
>> }
> Is there a 'standard' function lurking that will do the above.
> On x86 the cpus 'bit test' instruction will handle bit numbers
> greater than the word size - so it can be a single instruction.
Of course, there's test_bit().
> David
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists