[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CADA5E1@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:59:39 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Chen Gang S' <gang.chen@...rus.com.cn>,
"marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"gustavo@...ovan.org" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead
of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit()
From: Chen Gang S
> -static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
> +static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
> {
> return *((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) & ((__u32) 1 << (nr & 31));
> }
Is there a 'standard' function lurking that will do the above.
On x86 the cpus 'bit test' instruction will handle bit numbers
greater than the word size - so it can be a single instruction.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists