netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 19/29] net: vrf: Add vrf context to skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54D41736.9000507@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:21:58 -0700
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 19/29] net: vrf: Add vrf context to skb

On 2/5/15 6:45 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 05/02/2015 02:34, David Ahern a écrit :
>> On ingress skb's inherit vrf context from the net_device. For TX skb's
>> inherit the vrf context from the socket originating the packet. Update
>> SKB related net_ctx macros to set vrf.
> Is it really needed to have this skb->vrf?
> Is it not possible to get the vrf from sockets, interfaces, etc? Like
> it's done
> with netns?

One reason is for VRF_ANY context of sockets.
Another one is netlink messages getting funneled through a single kernel 
netlink socket; skb->vrf is used to retain vrf handling.

in time might be able to make it go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html