[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+BoTQmU4VXw7yD9bLAvrr6mqSbkYcNHZ1o-CcLUtb+kbQa7DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:57:59 +0100
From: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eyal Perry <eyalpe@....mellanox.co.il>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Throughput regression with `tcp: refine TSO autosizing`
On 5 February 2015 at 20:50, Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> And I really, really, really wish, that just once during this thread,
> someone had bothered to try running a test
> at a real world MCS rate - say MCS1, or MCS4, and measured the latency
> under load of that...
Time between frame submission to firmware and tx-completion on one of
my ath10k machines:
Legacy 54mbps: ~18ms
Legacy 6mbps: ~37ms
11n MCS 3 (nss=0): ~13ms
11n MCS 8 (nss=1): ~6-8ms
11ac NSS=1 MCS=2: ~4-6ms
11ac NSS=2 MCS=0: ~5-8ms
Keep in mind this is a clean room environment so retransmissions are
kept at minimum. Obviously with a noisy environment you'll get retries
at different rates and higher latency.
MichaĆ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists