lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOgR63dhGA4ULSACOSCBnU+uG_bMbegYY62o1etmRjo31BO9wQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 19:08:43 +0100 From: Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com> To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr> Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>, "isdn@...ux-pingi.de" <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers: isdn: act2000: capi.c: fix checkpatch errors I must have missed something. I fixed it on my end. Do I now resend the entire patchset or just this particular patch? regards, Bas 2015-02-07 19:02 GMT+01:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>: > On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> On 02/07/2015 08:06 PM, Bas Peters wrote: >> >> > This patch fixes the following checkpatch errors: >> > 1. trailing statement >> > 1. assignment of variable in if condition >> > 1. incorrectly placed brace after function definition >> >> > Signed-off-by: Bas Peters <baspeters93@...il.com> >> > --- >> > drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c | 9 ++++++--- >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c b/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c >> > index 3f66ca2..5d677e6 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c >> > +++ b/drivers/isdn/act2000/capi.c >> > @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ actcapi_chkhdr(act2000_card *card, actcapi_msghdr *hdr) >> > m->hdr.cmd.cmd = c; \ >> > m->hdr.cmd.subcmd = s; \ >> > m->hdr.msgnum = actcapi_nextsmsg(card); \ >> > - } else m = NULL; \ >> > + } else > > It looks like a \ was lost on this line. It should have caused a compiler > error. > > julia > >> > + m = NULL; \ >> >> Documentation/CodingStyle has an extra rule for such case: *else* branch >> should also have {} since *if* branch has {}. >> >> [...] >> >> WNR, Sergei >> >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists