lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAF2d9jhVAqDCyNP7De4cpqOTAoLpsar=T2i7S3sKCmOF2yukJw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:19:23 -0800 From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH next 2/6] bonding: implement bond_poll_controller() On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:51:51PM -0800, Mahesh Bandewar wrote: >> >> This patches implements the poll_controller support for all >> bonding driver. If the slaves have poll_controller net_op defined, >> this implementation calls them. This is mode agnostic implementation >> and iterates through all slaves (based on mode) and calls respective >> handler. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> > > > Really good patchset, thank you. Two nitpicks below, nothing serious. Also, > please, add Doc/bonding.txt changes for every user-visible > change/enhancement, this doc is a go-to for a lot of users. > > Otherwise, with the doc and other issues, pointed by Jay and Andy, fixed, I > guess it's good to go. The 0/ patch would be welcome too, btw. > > >> --- >> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 47 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/net/bond_3ad.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c >> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c >> index 9b436696b95e..14f2ebe786c5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c >> @@ -2477,6 +2477,30 @@ int bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(struct bonding >> *bond, struct ad_info *ad_info) >> return ret; >> } >> >> +#define BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL \ >> + (AD_STATE_DISTRIBUTING | AD_STATE_COLLECTING | \ >> + AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION | AD_STATE_AGGREGATION) >> + >> +static int bond_3ad_port_operational(struct slave *slave) >> +{ >> + port_t *port = &SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port; >> + >> + return bond_slave_can_tx(slave) && >> + (port->actor_oper_port_state & >> port->partner_oper.port_state & >> + BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL) == BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL; >> +} >> + >> +/* bond_3ad_port_is_active - check if a slave port is active or not. A >> port >> + * is active when it can forward traffic. >> + * >> + * @slave: slave port to check state for. >> + * Returns: 0 if not active else is active. >> + */ >> +int bond_3ad_port_is_active(struct slave *slave) >> +{ >> + return bond_3ad_port_operational(slave); >> +} >> + >> int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond, >> struct slave *slave) >> { >> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> index c9e519cb9214..a50ec87486f3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> @@ -928,6 +928,53 @@ static inline void slave_disable_netpoll(struct slave >> *slave) >> >> static void bond_poll_controller(struct net_device *bond_dev) >> { >> + struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev); >> + struct slave *slave = NULL; >> + struct list_head *iter; >> + struct ad_info ad_info; >> + struct aggregator *agg; >> + const struct net_device_ops *ops; >> + bool call_slave_netpoll; >> + >> + if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) >> + if (bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info)) >> + return; >> + >> + bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { >> + call_slave_netpoll = false; >> + switch (BOND_MODE(bond)) { >> + case BOND_MODE_8023AD: >> + agg = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port.aggregator; >> + if (!bond_slave_is_up(slave)) > > > bond_3ad_port_is_active() already contains the check for being up. > >> + break; >> + if (agg && agg->aggregator_identifier != > > > Hm, should we poll it without an aggregator? > >> + ad_info.aggregator_id) >> + break; >> + if (!bond_3ad_port_is_active(slave) && >> + ad_info.ports != 1) >> + break; >> + >> + call_slave_netpoll = true; >> + break; >> + default: >> + if (bond_slave_is_up(slave)) >> + call_slave_netpoll = true; >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + if (call_slave_netpoll) { >> + ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops; >> + if (ops->ndo_poll_controller) { > > > It's weird to see this check so down the road. Maybe reorg the logic to > something like: > > bond_for_each_slave() { > if (!bond_slave_is_up() || !bond_slave_has_ndo_poll()) > continue; > > if (BOND_MODE(bond) == 3AD && !bond_3ad_port_is_active()) > continue; > > slave-do_ndo_poll_stuff(); > } > > Just as a thought, might be easier to read/shorter. > > OK, I'll try that. thanks >> + struct netpoll_info *ni = >> + >> rcu_dereference_bh(slave->dev->npinfo); >> + >> + if (down_trylock(&ni->dev_lock)) >> + continue; >> + ops->ndo_poll_controller(slave->dev); >> + up(&ni->dev_lock); >> + } >> + } >> + } >> } >> >> static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev) >> diff --git a/include/net/bond_3ad.h b/include/net/bond_3ad.h >> index f04cdbb7848e..6c455c646d61 100644 >> --- a/include/net/bond_3ad.h >> +++ b/include/net/bond_3ad.h >> @@ -278,5 +278,6 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, >> struct bonding *bond, >> struct slave *slave); >> int bond_3ad_set_carrier(struct bonding *bond); >> void bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate(struct bonding *bond); >> +int bond_3ad_port_is_active(struct slave *slave); >> #endif /* _NET_BOND_3AD_H */ >> >> -- >> 2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists