lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150209113053.GB32669@dfawcus.brocade.com> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:30:53 +0000 From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@...cade.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com>, "Vipin Kumar" <vipin@...ulusnetworks.com>, Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/29] net: VRF support On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:36:05pm -0700, David Ahern wrote: > To make an L3 separation efficient from a large scale* perspective one > needs to give up something [snip] > > * scale here meaning VRFs from 1 to N, N for current products goes up to > 4000, though I know of that has mentioned 16k VRFs. FWIW - There is at least one router vendor which allows for the creation of more than 4096 VRFs. Some of its products have a specific limitation which may be less than the architectural maximum. DF -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists