[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150209113053.GB32669@dfawcus.brocade.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:30:53 +0000
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@...cade.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"Vipin Kumar" <vipin@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/29] net: VRF support
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 05:36:05pm -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> To make an L3 separation efficient from a large scale* perspective one
> needs to give up something
[snip]
>
> * scale here meaning VRFs from 1 to N, N for current products goes up to
> 4000, though I know of that has mentioned 16k VRFs.
FWIW - There is at least one router vendor which allows for the creation of
more than 4096 VRFs. Some of its products have a specific limitation
which may be less than the architectural maximum.
DF
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists