netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: qmi_wwan: MC73xx interface 10 is not QMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfDRXjhN7q98PKeddgoHhx8rFx+bf8YweTE62AbCfbi7v8E3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:30:02 +0100
From:	Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qmi_wwan: MC73xx interface 10 is not QMI

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
> That is pretty old relative to this hardware. First commercial release?
> I don't really want to push you to do an upgrade, but it would sure be
> nice to have this test repeated on a recent firmware version.  Not that
> I can spot anything particularily promising in the release notes.

I updated firmware now, but still see the same behavior.

> I did find our previous discussions about these two RMNET1 and RMNET2
> functions, e.g:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libqmi-devel/2014-July/000875.html
> and it seems to indicate that both work as long as you configure them
> for 802.3 framing. But that could just be an information feedback
> loop...

That is correct. In order for this device to accept network traffic
(or driver to accept packets from device), I have to set the transfer
mode to 802.3.

-Kristian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html