lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54D8D223.8040502@akamai.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:28:35 -0600 From: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com> To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch> CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: nft hash set expansion problem On 02/09/2015 09:21 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 02/09/15 at 08:44am, Josh Hunt wrote: >> On 02/08/2015 04:43 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>> This seems not correct as we want to have an upper limit for >>> rhashtable expansions. It's better to define a max_shift for >>> nftables, instead. >> >> Thanks Daniel that's what I wanted to know. I'll fix this on the nft_hash >> side. > > I agree it does not make sense to allow unlimited growth. > Can you enforce a max_shift > 0 in rhashtable_init() while you > are at it? > Yeah I'll do that as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists