[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28432.1423551917@famine>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 23:05:17 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
cc: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 4/6] bonding: Allow userspace to set system_priority
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
[...]
>Actually I was thinking of making ad_actor_sysprio instead of making
>ad_user_port_key (feels like having more underscores makes it
>unnecessary longer). That way all three look similar. So
>
> ad_actor_sysprio
> ad_actor_system
> ad_user_portkey
>
>All carry the same theme of meaning. Otherwise we could do something like -
>
> ad_actor_sys_prio
> ad_actor_sys_mac
> ad_user_port_key
>
>Which one seems more logical / reasonable?
FWIW, I would go with ad_actor_sys_prio, ad_actor_system and
ad_user_port_key. The first two then mimic the terms from the standard,
and the "user" one is part of the Actor_Admin_Port_Key from the
standard, so it follows the same sort of naming.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists