[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h9uuatcb.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:39:32 +0100
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com>
Cc: Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@...ksander.es>,
David Miller <davem@...hat.com>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qmi_wwan: MC73xx interface 10 is not QMI
Kristian Evensen <kristian.evensen@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Aleksander Morgado
> <aleksander@...ksander.es> wrote:
>> With ModemManager you can use both WWAN interfaces by creating
>> independent Bearer objects and getting them connected independently
>> (e.g. to different APNs). Not sure if anyone will ever do that, but
>> well.
>
> Thanks for reminding me of this use case. One scenario where it makes
> sense is how IPv4/IPv6 is handled by some mobile broadband operators.
> I know of at least one Norwegian ISP that at least used different APNs
> for IPv4 and IPv6.
Sure, very useful for testing, although I don't think that they meant it
that way. I believe the assumption is that you get full Internet access
using either APN, with DNS64/NAT64/464XLAT for the IPv6 only one.
Other use cases I can think of:
- dedicated MMS APN
- dedicated voice APN
- VPN APN(s)
all in combination with an Internet access APN. So yes, two independent
bearers are certainly useful. I expect many modems will support more
than one bearer in the near future. The Intel XMM7160 based modems,
like for example the Sierra Wireless EM7345, already support 8(!)
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists