[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54DB8CD8.8080102@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:09:44 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
Dinesh Dutt <ddutt@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Vipin Kumar <vipin@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: network namespace bloat
Le 11/02/2015 03:42, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
[snip]
>
> The next largest component appears to be all of the tunnel network
> devices that we allocate for compatibility reasons so that the old ioctl
> interfaces still work.
>
[snip]
>
>
> A knob (sysctl?) that controls the creation of the backwards
> compabitilty tunnel network devices seems desirable. As in many
> instances those are just overhead today.
Note that these interfaces are also used as fallback devices, they catch
packets that don't match any configured tunnels.
See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/249634/focus=249634
[snip]
>
> In my ideal world enough of these issues would be fixed that a
> new empty network namespace would consume less than 100KiB of memory.
+1
Regards,
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists