netdev - Re: udp v6 early demux?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1423630625.4847.0.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:57:05 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: udp v6 early demux?

On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 21:53 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:

> I was more wondering if we can avoid the route the lookup.  It may not always be
> a connected a case.  If you have multiple senders and a single receiver on the
> same subnet, avoiding the route lookup with early demux might help.

Yes, but early demux requires a connected socket, sorry.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html