netdev - Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87fvaa5ixe.fsf@free.fr>
Date:	Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:12:29 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> wrote:
> But isn't the real problem that in the device tree case,
> irq_get_irq_data(ndev->irq) will work becaus parsing an interrupt
> from the device tree populates it correctly in platform_get_irq()
> whereas for the legacy lookup it just fetches the number.
>
> So to me it seems like a weakness in the platform_get_irq()
> helper altogether.
>
> Does the following work? (I can send as a separate patch for
> testing if you like).

I will test this evening (GMT+1 time), I feel this will work, and that this
solution looks better to me than the sheer revert. I don't ask for a separate
patch, yet if it is confirmed that it works, you'll have to submit it anyway :)

Cheers.

--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html