lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54DDCB37.60603@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:00:23 +0800 From: yzhu1 <Yanjun.Zhu@...driver.com> To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Wu, Kuaikuai" <Kuaikuai.Wu@...driver.com>, "Tao, Yue" <Yue.Tao@...driver.com>, "stephen@...workplumber.org >> Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@...workplumber.org> Subject: Re: If bridge have no sub-interfaces, it's status may be still with 'RUNNING' Add the maintainer of bridge. Any reply is appreciated. Zhu Yanjun On 02/13/2015 05:57 PM, yzhu1 wrote: > Hi, all > > I made this test on ubuntu 14.04 with kernel 3,19-rc7: > > 1. brctl addbr br0 > > 2. ifconfig br0 up > > 3. ifconfig br0 (br0's status is with 'RUNNING') > > 4. brctl addif br0 eth0 > > 5. brctl delif br0 eth0 > > 6. ifconfig br0 (br0's status is without 'RUNNING') > > When there is no sub-interface, the flag "RUNNING" is missing after > the last sub-interface is removed. > > As such, should we keep "RUNNING" flag after the last sub-interface is > removed? > > Thanks a lot. > Zhu Yanjun > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists