| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAF2d9ji9GeQuDP1cLF8_4CDTSv2uhqsLhP9SVd5K+noP9kV2LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:36:13 -0800
From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v3 2/6] bonding: implement bond_poll_controller()
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh
<jay.vosburgh@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> >This patches implements the poll_controller support for all
> >bonding driver. If the slaves have poll_controller net_op defined,
> >this implementation calls them. This is mode agnostic implementation
> >and iterates through all slaves (based on mode) and calls respective
> >handler.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> >---
> >v1:
> > Initial version
> >v2:
> > Eliminate bool variable.
> >v3:
> > Rebase
> >
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/net/bond_3ad.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >index 9b436696b95e..14f2ebe786c5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> >@@ -2477,6 +2477,30 @@ int bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(struct bonding *bond, struct ad_info *ad_info)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> >+#define BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL \
> >+ (AD_STATE_DISTRIBUTING | AD_STATE_COLLECTING | \
> >+ AD_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION | AD_STATE_AGGREGATION)
> >+
> >+static int bond_3ad_port_operational(struct slave *slave)
> >+{
> >+ port_t *port = &SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port;
> >+
> >+ return bond_slave_can_tx(slave) &&
> >+ (port->actor_oper_port_state & port->partner_oper.port_state &
> >+ BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL) == BOND_3AD_PORT_OPERATIONAL;
> >+}
> >+
> >+/* bond_3ad_port_is_active - check if a slave port is active or not. A port
> >+ * is active when it can forward traffic.
> >+ *
> >+ * @slave: slave port to check state for.
> >+ * Returns: 0 if not active else is active.
> >+ */
> >+int bond_3ad_port_is_active(struct slave *slave)
> >+{
> >+ return bond_3ad_port_operational(slave);
> >+}
> >+
>
> Why the nesting here? I don't see other users of
> bond_3ad_port_operational, so why not move that logic to
> bond_3ad_port_is_active and eliminate the extra level of function call?
>
> Also, the test in bond_3ad_port_operational will exclude the
> case that the active agg port is Individual (e.g., link partner is not
> LACP-capable) as that case won't run the state machine to coll-dist
> state, but the agg is still available for TX/RX.
>
I missed this comment in the earlier reply. I wasn't sure if the
situation you described even works and hence I completely ignored that
case. Are you suggesting that this check can be eliminated and
replaced with just slave_can_tx() check? If not then what should be
the correct check?
Thanks,
--mahesh..
> -J
>
>
> > int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> > struct slave *slave)
> > {
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >index b979c265fc51..8433fe464f95 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >@@ -928,6 +928,39 @@ static inline void slave_disable_netpoll(struct slave *slave)
> >
> > static void bond_poll_controller(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> > {
> >+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> >+ struct slave *slave = NULL;
> >+ struct list_head *iter;
> >+ struct ad_info ad_info;
> >+ struct netpoll_info *ni;
> >+ const struct net_device_ops *ops;
> >+
> >+ if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
> >+ if (bond_3ad_get_active_agg_info(bond, &ad_info))
> >+ return;
> >+
> >+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> >+ ops = slave->dev->netdev_ops;
> >+ if (!bond_slave_is_up(slave) || !ops->ndo_poll_controller)
> >+ continue;
> >+
> >+ if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> >+ struct aggregator *agg =
> >+ SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port.aggregator;
> >+
> >+ if (agg && agg->aggregator_identifier !=
> >+ ad_info.aggregator_id)
> >+ continue;
> >+ if (!bond_3ad_port_is_active(slave) || ad_info.ports != 1)
> >+ continue;
>
> The above will exclude slaves that are in an aggregator with
> more than one member, which is likely to be the usual case. Is that
> intentional?
>
> Also, if this will only accept slaves from the active
> aggregator, and we're limiting it to case that the active agg has
> exactly one slave, why do we need to loop through all slaves of the
> bond? Could we do something (inside an "if (mode == 8023AD)" block)
> like:
>
> first_slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
> [...]
> agg = __get_active_agg(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(first_slave)->aggregator));
> if (agg->num_of_ports != 1)
> return;
> slave = agg->lag_ports->slave;
> if (!bond_3ad_port_is_active(slave)
> return;
> [...]
> ops->ndo_poll_controller(slave->dev);
>
> That would need some checks, but, basically, go from the active
> aggregator directly to its list of slaves.
>
> -J
>
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ ni = rcu_dereference_bh(slave->dev->npinfo);
> >+ if (down_trylock(&ni->dev_lock))
> >+ continue;
> >+ ops->ndo_poll_controller(slave->dev);
> >+ up(&ni->dev_lock);
> >+ }
> > }
> >
> > static void bond_netpoll_cleanup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> >diff --git a/include/net/bond_3ad.h b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >index f04cdbb7848e..6c455c646d61 100644
> >--- a/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >+++ b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
> >@@ -278,5 +278,6 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> > struct slave *slave);
> > int bond_3ad_set_carrier(struct bonding *bond);
> > void bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate(struct bonding *bond);
> >+int bond_3ad_port_is_active(struct slave *slave);
> > #endif /* _NET_BOND_3AD_H */
> >
> >--
> >2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c
>
> ---
> -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists