lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54E0F8DF.1060602@6wind.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:51:59 +0100 From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com> CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Justin Pettit <jpettit@...ira.com>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, "dev@...nvswitch.org" <dev@...nvswitch.org> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/4] openvswitch: Add conntrack action. Le 15/02/2015 20:13, Thomas Graf a écrit : > On 02/15/15 at 11:06am, Joe Stringer wrote: >> On 15 February 2015 at 07:08, Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote: >>> Le 15/02/2015 05:47, Joe Stringer a écrit : >>>> Right, it was more of a general sanity check which is likely unneeded. >>>> I'm not aware of any particular case that this handles. >>> >>> I agree with Thomas. If we fall into this case, it's probably a real bug ;-) >> >> We can BUG_ON(), then. > > Let's do a WARN() and just error so we keep the kernel running ;-) Yes. I wonder if there are more generic places to do this kind of check, because I don't think that this kind of bug will be specific to ovs. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists