lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcYDLksA3gbJFypgp+f3BreMTTD5roHecoKm67M7qExOtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:05:12 -0800
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Indirect phy access for mv88e6171

2015-02-15 12:25 GMT-08:00 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>:
>> I'll try. My primary problem right now is that I run Lennert Buytenhek's
>> patch set to support bridging offload (aka hardware bridging) on top of
>> the upstream dsa code, and the upstream code now supports a competing /
>> alternate means  to support bridging/switching offload (NET_SWITCHDEV)
>> which doesn't work with dsa (at least not yet). So I'll have to figure
>> out if / how I can run your patches with my code base, or how I can add
>> add support for NET_SWITCHDEV into dsa.
>
> We should be adding switchdev support to DSA for hardware
> bridging. The concepts in Lennert Buytenhek's should be a good
> starting point for this.

In fact, there is not much to be implemented in DSA, since we already
have everything in place in net-next now:

- net_device notifier to learn which ports are leaving/joining the bridge
- hook an abstraction for ndo_switch_port_stp_update
- hook an abstraction for ndo_fdb_{add,del,dump}

>
>> Do you know if there are any efforts going on in that direction ?
>
> Florian has expressed an interest in getting hardware bridging
> working. I've no idea if he has looked at it from the perspective of
> switchdev.

I have some patches that leverage the switchdev-related patches and
bring an abstraction to DSA, they should not be fundamentally
different at the DSA driver level, since most of the abstraction is
done in net/dsa/slave.c, I plan on posting these patches tomorrow once
I am back home. I tested these with the bcm_sf2 driver, so testing
with Marvell hardware would be more than welcome.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists