[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54E1ECE6.60703@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:13:10 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Sathya Perla <Sathya.Perla@...lex.Com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] be2net: replace (1 << x) with BIT(x)
Hello.
On 2/16/2015 3:55 PM, Sathya Perla wrote:
>>> From: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara.volam@...lex.com>
>>> BIT(x) is the preffered usage.
>> Preferred.
> :-) As this is a harmless spelling mistake only in the changelog,
> I'll not bother sending a new patch for this!
OK...
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h
>>> index 3b1d59d..9869556 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be.h
>>> @@ -361,15 +361,15 @@ enum vf_state {
>>> ASSIGNED = 1
>>> };
>>>
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_LINK_STATUS_INIT 1
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_SRIOV_ENABLED (1 << 2)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_WORKER_SCHEDULED (1 << 3)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_VLAN_PROMISC (1 << 4)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_MCAST_PROMISC (1 << 5)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_NAPI_ENABLED (1 << 9)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_QNQ_ASYNC_EVT_RCVD (1 << 11)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_VXLAN_OFFLOADS (1 << 12)
>>> -#define BE_FLAGS_SETUP_DONE (1 << 13)
>>> +#define BE_FLAGS_LINK_STATUS_INIT BIT(1)
>> Not BIT(0)?
> Huh, this was not intentional. I'll remember to use bit-0 the next time
> we introduce a new bit!
Note that bit 0 was used for BE_FLAGS_LINK_STATUS_INIT before your patch.
[...]
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists