[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1424171410.4942.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 03:10:10 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Madhu Challa <challa@...ronetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] multicast: Extend ip address command to enable
multicast group join/leave on IP level.
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 14:20 -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> Joining multicast group on ethernet level via "ip maddr" command would
> not work if we have an Ethernet switch that does igmp snooping since
> the switch would not replicate multicast packets on ports that did not
> have IGMP reports for the multicast addresses.
>
...
> +struct mc_autojoin_request {
> + union {
> + struct sockaddr_in sin;
> + struct sockaddr_in6 sin6;
> + } addr;
> + int ifindex;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + struct work_struct ipv4_work;
> + struct work_struct ipv6_work;
> + bool join;
> +};
This looks a net-next patch, right ?
You do not need 2 separate work_struct. A single one is enough, or even
no work queue at all as a matter of fact.
I'll send a preparation patch like this one, then you'll be able to call
__ip_mc_{join|leave}_group() directly while RTNL is held.
[PATCH net-next] igmp: add __ip_mc_{join|leave}_group()
There is a need to perform igmp join/leave operations while RTNL is
held. Make ip_mc_{join|leave}_group() wrappers around __ip_mc_{join|
leave}_group() to avoid the proliferation of work queues.
...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists