[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAE4D1E@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 12:04:22 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Jiri Slaby' <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
karl beldan <karl.beldan@...il.com>,
Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@...ierawaves.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3.12 065/122] lib/checksum.c: fix carry in
csum_tcpudp_nofold
> +static inline u32 from64to32(u64 x)
> +{
> + /* add up 32-bit and 32-bit for 32+c bit */
> + x = (x & 0xffffffff) + (x >> 32);
> + /* add up carry.. */
> + x = (x & 0xffffffff) + (x >> 32);
> + return (u32)x;
> +}
As a matter of interest, does the compiler optimise away the
second (x & 0xffffffff) ?
The code could just be:
x = (x & 0xffffffff) + (x >> 32);
return x + (x >> 32);
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists