[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7Os10B8KuBV0K9qp48zo2+=_aXUR-k5ocXjEWYqtq222w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:00:16 -0800
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Ignacy Gawędzki
<ignacy.gawedzki@...en-communications.fr>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ematch: Fix auto-loading of ematch modules.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ignacy Gawędzki
<ignacy.gawedzki@...en-communications.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:36:06AM -0800, thus spake Cong Wang:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ignacy Gawędzki
>> <ignacy.gawedzki@...en-communications.fr> wrote:
>> > In tcf_em_validate(), when calling tcf_em_lookup(), don't put the resulting
>> > pointer directly into em->ops, if the function is to possibly return -EAGAIN
>> > after module auto-loading. Otherwise, module_put() will be called by
>> > tcf_em_tree_destroy() on em->ops->owner, while it has already been called by
>> > tcf_em_validate() before return.
>> >
>>
>> Or simply reset em->ops to NULL after module_put()?
>
> Yeah, why not. I just got my inspiration from what's done in cls_api.c and
> act_api.c. What do you think, should the same simplification be applied to
> cls_api.c?
>
I prefer the smaller change, we don't have to align with cls_api.c.
Yeah, you can always clean it up for net-next.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists