netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] net: dsa: integrate with SWITCHDEV for HW bridging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150218011955.GA17155@lunn.ch>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 02:19:55 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
	jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
	cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] net: dsa: integrate with SWITCHDEV for HW
 bridging

> +/* Return a bitmask of all ports being currently bridged. Note that on
> + * leave, the mask will still return the bitmask of ports currently bridged,
> + * prior to port removal, and this is exactly what we want.
> + */
> +static u32 dsa_slave_br_port_mask(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> +	unsigned int port;
> +	u32 mask = 0;
> +
> +	for (port = 0; port < DSA_MAX_PORTS; port++) {
> +		if (!((1 << port) & ds->phys_port_mask))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (ds->ports[port]->priv_flags & IFF_BRIDGE_PORT)
> +			mask |= 1 << port;
> +	}
> +
> +       return mask;
> +}
> +
> +static int dsa_slave_bridge_port_join(struct net_device *dev,
> +				      struct net_device *bridge)
> +{
> +	struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct dsa_switch *ds = p->parent;
> +	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (ds->drv->port_join_bridge)
> +		ret = ds->drv->port_join_bridge(ds, p->port,
> +						dsa_slave_br_port_mask(ds));

Hi Florian

Shouldn't this bridge port mask also be dependent on bridge?

I'm thinking of cases like

brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 lan0
brctl addif br0 lan1

brctl addbr br1
brctl addif br1 lan2
brctl addif br1 lan3

We have two software bridges, so need two masks.  It does look like
your hardware and the Marvell hardware supports this, disjoint sets of
bridged ports.  But with the current implementation, your going to end
up with one hardware bridge with four ports, and broken STP.

       Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html