lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7PdG+jDqFA1jDFzHtkrxqLEZdtj1w5QyrdYMO4fX6+A1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:18:13 -0800
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why do we use RX queue mapping for TX?

Hi, David

With regarding to the following commit:

commit d5a9e24afb4ab38110ebb777588ea0bd0eacbd0a
Author: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date:   Tue Jan 27 16:22:11 2009 -0800

    net: Allow RX queue selection to seed TX queue hashing.

What's the point of this commit? It looks like it is for routers
where skb->queue_mapping is preserved across forwarding.
Or some software interface, but they usually don't even have
a queue.

But:

1) the incoming interface may not be same with the outgoing
interface, therefore they may not has the same number of queues.
Even if it's the same interface, the number of RX queues doesn't
have to be same with TX queues either.

2) This breaks the queue mapping specified by an skbedit action,
since for TX queues the index starts with 0 while for RX it starts with 1
(for some reason I don't see yet). There is at least a mismatch.

3) Since both TX and RX use the same field ->queue_mapping,
I assume normally it is supposed to be set and used only by one of them,
so the above commit kinda breaks this too.

Or am I still missing anything?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ