lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:14:08 -0800 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Why do we use RX queue mapping for TX? On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 14:11 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> wrote: > > > > 2) This breaks the queue mapping specified by an skbedit action, > > since for TX queues the index starts with 0 while for RX it starts with 1 > > (for some reason I don't see yet). There is at least a mismatch. > > So queue 0 is reserved for TX, at least for bonding queue mapping. It seems you missed that bonding ndo_select_queue() is rather special. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists