netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/7 linux-next] wan: cosa: replace current->state by set_current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:02:26 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Jan \"Yenya\" Kasprzak" <kas@...muni.cz>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 linux-next] wan: cosa: replace current->state by
 set_current_state()

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:31:53AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 19:58 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Maybe this might be self documented in set_current_state(),
> as we have about 120 calls to __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 41c60e5302d7..26133da6445e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -275,7 +275,11 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
>  #define set_current_state(state_value)				\
>  	do {							\
>  		current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_;		\
> -		set_mb(current->state, (state_value));		\
> +		if (__builtin_constant_p(state_value) &&	\
> +		    (state_value) == TASK_RUNNING)		\
> +			current->state = (state_value);		\
> +		else						\
> +			set_mb(current->state, (state_value));	\
>  	} while (0)

lkml.kernel.org/r/20150206163947.GR21418@...ns.programming.kicks-ass.net

The problem is that there _might_ be someone relying on that barrier.

Its (very) unlikely, but you don't want to risk subtle borkage just
because. And I'm too lazy to go audit all of them :/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html