[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220035514.GA5017@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:55:14 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com, cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: implement HW bridging
operations
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:02:41AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Not sure yet what to do about setting the fdb aging time. I don't
> > see a mechanism to do that. No idea how important that is.
>
> Hi Guenter
>
> I don't know about your chip, but the public data sheet for the
> 88e6060 talks about being able to set the age time globally in the ATU
> control register. The granularity is not so good, multiple of 16
> seconds, so it could be the hardware bridge times out an entry faster
> than the software bridge.
>
Yes, but only if the minimum is configured. The default is about 5.5
minutes on mv88e6352. I didn't check the default on the other 886exxx
chips, but I assume it is the same.
Problem is topology changes or non-standard aging times. Maybe fdb flush
on port status changes takes care of those cases; I am just not sure if
that is sufficient.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists