[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150220010352.GA300@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:03:52 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com, andrew@...n.ch,
cphealy@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: implement HW bridging
operations
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:51:30PM -0800, roopa wrote:
> >
> >Not sure yet what to do about setting the fdb aging time. I don't see a
> >mechanism to do that. No idea how important that is.
> rocker, the only consumer today relies on the bridge driver aging of learnt
> entries.
> You could do the same.
>
Remember that we are dealing with hardware switch chips. Those chips
won't time out fdb entries just because the kernel's bridge driver
thinks that it should.
Am I missing something ?
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists