[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1502201657390.8221@hellgate.skynet>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:19:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Jonas Johansson <jonasj76@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
cc: Jonas Johansson <jonasj76@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Johansson <jonas.johansson@...termo.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dsa: bonding: implement HW bonding
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:51:12AM +0100, Jonas Johansson wrote:
>> From: Jonas Johansson <jonas.johansson@...termo.se>
>>
>> This patch will implement hooks for hardware bonding support for the DSA
>> driver. When the team driver adds a DSA slave port the port will be assigned
>> a bond group id and the DSA slave driver can setup the hardware. When team
>> changes the port state (enabled/disabled) the DSA slave driver is able to
>> use the attach/detach callback which will allow the hardware to change the
>> hardware settings to reflect the state.
>>
>> Added DSA hooks:
>> bond_add_group: To add a port to a bond group
>> bond_del_group: To remove a port from a bond group
>> bond_attach: To mark the port in a bond group as attached/active
>> bond_detach: To unmark the port in a bond group as detach/inactive
>>
>> Added new network device hooks:
>> ndo_bond_attach: To attach a device to a bond group.
>> ndo_bond_detach: To detach a device from a bond group.
>>
>> Team:
>> Added callback to ndo_bond_attach when port is enabled.
>> Added callback to ndo_bond_detach when port is disabled.
>>
>> Added DSA notifier:
>> Listening on NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER to add or deleta a port to/from a bond group.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Johansson <jonas.johansson@...termo.se>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/team/team.c | 4 ++++
>> include/linux/netdevice.h | 8 +++++++
>> include/net/dsa.h | 8 +++++++
>> net/dsa/dsa.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 6 +++++
>> net/dsa/slave.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team.c b/drivers/net/team/team.c
>> index 0e62274..f7b2afb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/team/team.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/team/team.c
>> @@ -934,6 +934,8 @@ static void team_port_enable(struct team *team,
>> team->ops.port_enabled(team, port);
>> team_notify_peers(team);
>> team_mcast_rejoin(team);
>> + if (port->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bond_attach)
>> + port->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bond_attach(port->dev);
>> }
>>
>> static void __reconstruct_port_hlist(struct team *team, int rm_index)
>> @@ -965,6 +967,8 @@ static void team_port_disable(struct team *team,
>> team_adjust_ops(team);
>> team_notify_peers(team);
>> team_mcast_rejoin(team);
>> + if (port->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bond_detach)
>> + port->dev->netdev_ops->ndo_bond_detach(port->dev);
>> }
>>
>> #define TEAM_VLAN_FEATURES (NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG | \
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 5897b4e..8ebaefa 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -939,6 +939,12 @@ typedef u16 (*select_queue_fallback_t)(struct net_device *dev,
>> * int (*ndo_del_slave)(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *slave_dev);
>> * Called to release previously enslaved netdev.
>> *
>> + * int (*ndo_bond_attach)(struct net_device *dev);
>> + * Called to attach the device to a bond group.
>> + *
>> + * int (*ndo_bond_detach)(struct net_device *dev);
>> + * Called to detach the device from a bond group.
>> + *
>> * Feature/offload setting functions.
>> * netdev_features_t (*ndo_fix_features)(struct net_device *dev,
>> * netdev_features_t features);
>> @@ -1131,6 +1137,8 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>> struct net_device *slave_dev);
>> int (*ndo_del_slave)(struct net_device *dev,
>> struct net_device *slave_dev);
>> + int (*ndo_bond_attach)(struct net_device *dev);
>> + int (*ndo_bond_detach)(struct net_device *dev);
>> netdev_features_t (*ndo_fix_features)(struct net_device *dev,
>> netdev_features_t features);
>> int (*ndo_set_features)(struct net_device *dev,
>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>> index ed3c34b..64b5963 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>> @@ -254,6 +254,14 @@ struct dsa_switch_driver {
>> int (*get_eee)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> struct ethtool_eee *e);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Bonding
>> + */
>> + int (*bond_add_group)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int gid);
>> + int (*bond_del_group)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, int gid);
>> + int (*bond_attach)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
>> + int (*bond_detach)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_DSA_HWMON
>> /* Hardware monitoring */
>> int (*get_temp)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int *temp);
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
>> index 2173402..3d2c599 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <net/dsa.h>
>> +#include <net/rtnetlink.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
>> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> @@ -442,6 +443,62 @@ static void dsa_link_poll_timer(unsigned long _dst)
>> schedule_work(&dst->link_poll_work);
>> }
>>
>> +/* net device notifier event handler ****************************************/
>> +static int dsa_master_changed(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct dsa_switch *ds = p->parent;
>> + struct net_device *master = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
>> + int err = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Add port to bond group */
>> + if (master && master->rtnl_link_ops &&
>> + !strcmp(master->rtnl_link_ops->kind, "team")) {
>> +
>> + p->bond_gid = master->ifindex;
>> +
>> + if (!ds->drv->bond_add_group)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + return ds->drv->bond_add_group(ds, p->port, p->bond_gid);
>> + }
>
> Hi Jonas
>
> Maybe it is here and i cannot see it, but where do you check the slave
> devices in the group are in the same physical switch. Remember that
> DSA allows nearly arbitrary trees of switches.
>
> Andrew
>
Thanks for the review.
You are correct, there is no check if the slave devices are in the same
physical switch. I know that some devices (e.g. 88E6095) can handle
cross-chip trunking, but as this implementation was targeting single-chip
trunking you are correct that a check needs to be implemented to prevent
the slaves to spread over several devices. I'll look into it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists