netdev - Re: 1e918876 breaks r8169 (linux-3.18+)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2015 20:05:08 +0100
From:	Tomas Szepe <szepe@...erecords.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Marco Berizzi <pupilla@...mail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 1e918876 breaks r8169 (linux-3.18+)

> > David, please consider reverting
> > 
> > 1e918876853aa85435e0f17fd8b4a92dcfff53d6
> > (r8169: add support for Byte Queue Limits)
> > 
> > 	and
> > 
> > 0bec3b700d106a8b0a34227b2976d1a582f1aab7
> > (r8169: add support for xmit_more)
> > 
> > I cannot reproduce any hangs (tried for 2days with 40 parallel
> > netperfs using both 100mbit and 1gbit receiver).
> > 
> > And I don't see anything wrong with the change either.
> > Seems like some revisions of the HW are just dodgy?
> > 
> > I hate giving up, but I have no means to diagnose this any further.
> > Even reporter says it doesn't affect all of his r8169 nics.
> > 
> > So I think the change is correct per se, but might be revealing some
> > HW/firmware bug.
> 
> Hold on.
> 
> I believe there is one race in the way you access skb->xmit_more _after_
> 
> txd->opts1 = cpu_to_le32(status);
> 
> After this point, TX might have completed and TX completion already have
> freed skb
> 
> Could Tomas try following fix ?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index ad0020af2193..f2764366a36c 100644
> ...

Sure, just did.  Unfortunately, 3.19.0 + 0bec3b70 + this patch results
in a driver that retains the problem.

Sorry,
-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@...erecords.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html