[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EB37C7.3090209@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:23:03 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
jerome.oufella@...oirfairelinux.com,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] net: dsa: integrate with SWITCHDEV for HW bridging
On 02/23/2015 05:34 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> BTW, before I re-submit this patch series, do you think we should
>> introduce a fdb_flush() callback that switch drivers are required to
>> implement, and invoke it from net/dsa/slave.c upon port join/leave?
>
> Probably a good idea.
>
> We should define exactly what is flushed. Everything? Or only dynamic
> entries? The Marvell hardware can also have multicast addresses in its
> tables, which can age, or static unicast and multicast entries.
>
I currently use ATU command 110 (flush all non-static entries in a
particular FID). I see means to flush either all entries or all
non-static entries, but no means to only flush unicast or multicast
entries. Does any of the standards distinguish between learned unicast
and multicast addresses ? Flushing those selectively might be a
challenge.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists