lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:36:00 -0600
From:	Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, tgraf@...g.ch,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rhashtable: require max_shift if grow_decision
 defined

On 02/24/2015 12:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:10:57 -0500
>
>> If an rhashtable user defines a grow_decision fn they must also define a
>> max_shift parameter.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>
>
> I've already said today that I think this whole indirection stuff
> with grow and shrink decisions should simply go away.
>
> Everyone defines it to the generic rhashtable routine, therefore
> that should just be made private to lib/rhashtable.c, called
> directly, and the methods completely removed.
>
> Given that, this change makes no sense.
>
> When a limit is not specified, we should unconditionally grow rather
> than refuse to grow.  One should not be required to specify this at
> all.  If you have no idea what limit might be reasonable, you specify
> nothing at all and just let available memory be the limiting factor.
>

I don't particularly care how this gets fixed at this point, just that 
it gets fixed. Right now nft hash sets can't expand b/c of this 
limitation. If we fix it by removing the max_shift requirement that 
works for me :)

Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ