lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:58:52 +0200
From:	Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: use skb->priority for overloading
 skb->dropcount and skb->reserved_tailroom instead of skb->mark

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:48 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:56:33 +0200
>
>> May I suggest to unalias 'mark' out of the union?
>
> Only in exchange for finding a way to remove completely another object
> of the same size from sk_buff.
>
> I refuse to let it grow any more, it's already way too big.

I agree that aliasing skb->priority with skb->dropcount and
skb->reserved_tailroom is
less than optimal.

I can suggest an alternative patch following Eric Dumazet's suggestion in which
skb->dropcount is removed and skb->cb[] is used instead for keeping dropcount.

That would require protocol family implementations to access skb->cb[]
via a common
accessor or use a common offset #define from the start of skb->cb[].

Eyal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists