[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1424783915.5565.74.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 05:18:35 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: use skb->priority for overloading
skb->dropcount and skb->reserved_tailroom instead of skb->mark
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:10 +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
>
> Well, gave it a shot... it looks like several protocol families
> (packet, rxrpc, bluetooth) do not
> have room in skb->cb[] for the dropcount - at least on my 64 bit machine.
No idea how you took a look ?
sizeof(struct packet_skb_cb) == 24 : We have plenty of room ?
bluetooth : Whole struct rxrpc_skb_priv is not used when packet is
stored in receive queue.
We only need bt_cb(skb)->psm & bt_cb(skb)->bdaddr according to
l2cap_skb_msg_name()
An union will be possible.
rxpc is buggy right now anyway, as it reads skb->mark _and_ uses
sock_recv_ts_and_drops(), so skb->mark value is pretty much void.
Note that resend_at field could probably converted into u32. tcp stack
uses same (u32)jiffies trick (tcp_time_stamp)
I never said it was going to be easy ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists