[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54EE560E.8050504@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:09:02 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 4/4] fib_trie: Remove leaf_info
On 02/25/2015 02:29 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
>> -static void insert_leaf_info(struct tnode *l, struct leaf_info *new)
>> +static void fib_insert_alias(struct tnode *l, struct fib_alias *fa,
>> + struct fib_alias *new)
>> {
>> - struct hlist_head *head = &l->list;
>> - struct leaf_info *li, *last = NULL;
>> + if (fa) {
>> + hlist_add_before_rcu(&new->fa_list, &fa->fa_list);
>> + } else {
>> + struct fib_alias *last;
>>
>> - hlist_for_each_entry(li, head, hlist) {
>> - if (new->slen < li->slen)
>> - break;
>> - last = li;
>> - }
>> + hlist_for_each_entry(last, &l->leaf, fa_list) {
>> + if (new->fa_slen < last->fa_slen)
>> + break;
> If there is some fa in list with higher fa_slen
> fib_find_alias will always stop the loop and come with
> fa != NULL, so above 'if...break' is not needed, we are
> always going to add at tail when fa is NULL.
Actually fib_find_alias will return NULL in the case that there was a
hole in which the suffix length does not exist.
So for example if we have a suffix length of 8 and one of 10 and we are
adding a suffix length of 9 then fib_find_alias will return NULL and we
need to walk though the list and find the hole we are supposed to drop
the suffix in.
>
>> + fa = last;
>> + }
>>
>> - if (last)
>> - hlist_add_behind_rcu(&new->hlist, &last->hlist);
>> - else
>> - hlist_add_head_rcu(&new->hlist, head);
>> + if (fa)
>> + hlist_add_behind_rcu(&new->fa_list, &fa->fa_list);
>> + else
>> + hlist_add_head_rcu(&new->fa_list, &l->leaf);
>> + }
>>
>> @@ -1187,7 +1127,7 @@ int fib_table_insert(struct fib_table *tb, struct fib_config *cfg)
>> fa_match = NULL;
>> fa_first = fa;
>> hlist_for_each_entry_from(fa, fa_list) {
>> - if (fa->fa_tos != tos)
>> + if ((fa->fa_slen != slen) || (fa->fa_tos != tos))
> 'fa->fa_slen == slen' check is also needed in the
> above 'if' that is not present in the patch:
>
> if (fa && fa->fa_slen == slen && fa->fa_tos == tos &&
> fa->fa_info->fib_priority == fi->fib_priority) {
>
> Without such check we may wrongly enter the 'if'
> when fa->fa_slen > slen and to get some error, to
> replace the wrong fa or to append after it.
Actually we don't need it because fib_find_alias will return NULL if the
slen value doesn't match.
>> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(fa, &n->leaf, fa_list) {
>> + struct fib_info *fi = fa->fa_info;
>> + int nhsel, err;
>>
>> - if (((key ^ n->key) >> fa->fa_slen) &&
>> - ((BITS_PER_LONG > KEYLENGTH) ||
>> - (fa->fa_slen != KEYLENGTH)))
>> - continue;
>> - if (fa->fa_tos && fa->fa_tos != flp->flowi4_tos)
>> - continue;
>> - if (fi->fib_dead)
>> + if (((key ^ n->key) >= (1ul << fa->fa_slen)) &&
>> + ((BITS_PER_LONG > KEYLENGTH) || (fa->fa_slen != KEYLENGTH)))
>> continue;
> lshift 32 for 32-bit int has the same side effects, so
> BITS_PER_LONG is not needed.
I'll submit a v2 just to clean up the first few patches so that they
correctly use the 1ul w/ left shift instead of performing a right shift
on the key value.
>
> Both left and right shift get same result on 64-bit:
>
> # ./a 32
> 7
> 7
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> unsigned int a = 7;
>
> printf("%u\n", a >> atoi(argv[1]));
> printf("%u\n", a << atoi(argv[1]));
> return 0;
> }
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Why are you showing me an example with a 32b int when I am using a
long? For x86 a 32b shift on a 32b value is undefined so we need to
compare the suffix length to the KEYLENGTH. For 64b a long value can be
shifted up to 63 bits and still be a defined value. That is why I use
"1ul" as the value being shifted and then also perform the check for
KEYLENGTH vs BITS_PER_LONG in order to determine if I still need the
check for fa_slen != KEYLENGTH.
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists