[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHsH6GthPu2w8F+jqbeMt9kano6uHdicrmMhsLugLt-0exLVUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:10:29 +0200
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: use skb->priority for overloading
skb->dropcount and skb->reserved_tailroom instead of skb->mark
>>
>> bluetooth : Whole struct rxrpc_skb_priv is not used when packet is
>> stored in receive queue.
>>
>> We only need bt_cb(skb)->psm & bt_cb(skb)->bdaddr according to
>> l2cap_skb_msg_name()
>>
>> An union will be possible.
>>
>
> I can look into that.
Another approach is to get rid struct_req_ctrl defintion -
It is never used as a separate object outside of struct bt_skb_cb and inlining
it saves 8 bytes on a 64 bit machine, i.e.:
typedef void (*hci_req_complete_t)(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status,
u16 opcode);
-struct hci_req_ctrl {
- bool start;
- u8 event;
- hci_req_complete_t complete;
-};
-
struct bt_skb_cb {
__u8 pkt_type;
__u8 incoming;
__u16 opcode;
__u16 expect;
__u8 force_active;
+ bool req_start;
+ u8 req_event;
+ hci_req_complete_t req_complete;
struct l2cap_chan *chan;
struct l2cap_ctrl control;
- struct hci_req_ctrl req;
bdaddr_t bdaddr;
__le16 psm;
};
Would you prefer this approach?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists