lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:07:06 -0800 From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, Eugene Yakubovich <eugene.yakubovich@...eos.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: What are the intended semantics of IFLA_LINK_NETNSID? On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote: > I suspect the correct fix for rtnl_newlink is to just use > IFLA_LINK_NETNSID in rtnl_link_get_net and have it be an alternative way > of setting dest_net. But you may intend some different semantics that > I don't understand. > Looking at the example provided in iproute2, link-netnsid should refer the the netns, by the given ID, where the underlying link is. The difference is that this ID is only unique in a given netns, and refers to another peer netns. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists