lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAF0B29@AcuExch.aculab.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:35:04 +0000 From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> To: 'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values From: Joe Perches > At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check > so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value. Isn't it much safer to avoid sscanf() completely and use a different function for converting numerics? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists