netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1CAF0B29@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:35:04 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] wireless: test sscanf return values

From: Joe Perches
> At some point, it'd be good to make sscanf use __must_check
> so make sure the net/ uses of sscanf use the return value.

Isn't it much safer to avoid sscanf() completely and use
a different function for converting numerics?

	David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html