[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F0721E.1030703@mojatatu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:33:18 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"dborkman@...hat.com" <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"jesse@...ira.com" <jesse@...ira.com>,
"jpettit@...ira.com" <jpettit@...ira.com>,
"joestringer@...ira.com" <joestringer@...ira.com>,
"sfeldma@...il.com" <sfeldma@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"roopa@...ulusnetworks.com" <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"gospo@...ulusnetworks.com" <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"bcrl@...ck.org" <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Flows! Offload them.
On 02/26/15 10:39, John Fastabend wrote:
> So I think there is a relatively simple solution for this. Assuming
> I read the description correctly namely packet ingress' nic/switch
> and you want it to land in a namespace.
>
> Today we support offloaded macvlan's and SR-IOV. What I would expect
> is user creates a set of macvlan's that are "offloaded" this just means
> they are bound to a set of hardware queues and do not go through the
> normal receive path. Then assigning these to a namespace is the same
> as any other netdev.
>
> Hardware has an action to forward to "VSI" (virtual station interface)
> which matches on a packet and forwards it to either a VF or set of
> queues bound to a macvlan. Or you can do the forwarding using standards
> based protocols such as EVB (edge virtual bridging).
>
> So its a simple set of steps with the flow api,
>
> 1. create macvlan with dfwd_offload set
> 2. push netdev into namespace
> 3. add flow rule to match traffic and send to VSI
> ./flow -i ethx set_rule match xyz action fwd_vsi 3
>
> The VSI# is reported by ip link today its a bit clumsy so that interface
> could be cleaned up.
>
> Here is a case where trying to map this onto a 'tc' action in software
> is a bit awkward and you convoluted what is really a simple operation.
> Anyways this is not really an "offload" in the sense that your taking
> something that used to run in software and moving it 1:1 into hardware.
> Adding SR-IOV/VMDQ support requries new constructs. By the way if you
> don't like my "flow" tool and you want to move it onto "tc" that could
> be done as well but the steps are the same.
>
Sorry for the top post - just wanted to leave the context intact.
TU (that is a "thumbs up" from an anti +1 person) on what you said
above. But i dont see the issue you bring up in step #3. If i was to
say:
tc filter add ingress ethx classifier foo priority X \
match xyz action redirect macvlan3 offload
where "offload" sets the netlink or classifier specific instruction
to offload.
You can easily map macvlan3 to vsi 3.
cheers,
jamal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists