lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54F127FF.1060207@windriver.com> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:29:19 +0800 From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com> To: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>, "viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net> CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tipc: Don't use iocb argument in socket layer On 02/27/2015 09:30 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: >> > socket *sock, long *timeo_p) static int tipc_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, >> > struct socket *sock, >> > struct msghdr *m, size_t dsz) >> > { >> > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk; >> > + int ret; > alternative method: > > bool has_lock = false; >> > + >> > + lock_sock(sk); > > if (!owned_by_user(sk) { > lock_sock(sk); > has_lock = true; > } >> > + ret = __tipc_sendmsg(sock, m, dsz); > [expand code here, instead of an extra call] > > if (has_lock)) > release_sock(); > > Not sure what I prefer, but I just wanted to indicate > this option. > Thanks! In my opinion, the current version seems more clear. :) > You can anyway add a "Reviewed-by" from me. Regards, Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists