[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54F127FF.1060207@windriver.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:29:19 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
"viro@...IV.linux.org.uk" <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] tipc: Don't use iocb argument in socket
layer
On 02/27/2015 09:30 PM, Jon Maloy wrote:
>> > socket *sock, long *timeo_p) static int tipc_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb,
>> > struct socket *sock,
>> > struct msghdr *m, size_t dsz)
>> > {
>> > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> > + int ret;
> alternative method:
>
> bool has_lock = false;
>> > +
>> > + lock_sock(sk);
>
> if (!owned_by_user(sk) {
> lock_sock(sk);
> has_lock = true;
> }
>> > + ret = __tipc_sendmsg(sock, m, dsz);
> [expand code here, instead of an extra call]
>
> if (has_lock))
> release_sock();
>
> Not sure what I prefer, but I just wanted to indicate
> this option.
>
Thanks! In my opinion, the current version seems more clear. :)
> You can anyway add a "Reviewed-by" from me.
Regards,
Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists