[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150301182425.GA23622@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 19:24:25 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] flow_dissector: Add hash_extra field to
flow_keys struct
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > I've been toying around with reducing skb->cb[] to 44 bytes,
> > Seems Tom could integrate following patch from my test branch:
> >
> > http://git.breakpoint.cc/cgit/fw/net-next.git/commit/?h=skb_cb_44_01&id=29d711e1a71244b71940c2d1e346500bef4d6670
> >
> > It makes sfq use a smaller flow key state.
>
> Alternatively, I think we might be able to eliminate the use of
> flow_keys and flow_dissect from the qdisc code altogether. It looks
> like this is only being used to determine a hash over the addresses,
> ports, and protocol so I am thinking that we can just call
> skb_get_hash for that. Will try to post some patches soon.
The problem with this is that you'll lose the secret input to jhash
in sfq_hash().
assuming you have packets p1 and p2 (from different flows)
with skb_get_hash(p1) == skb_get_hash(p2) those flows share same
queue/bin forever as the hash pertubation will no longer work.
For sfq, hash collisions may exist as well but they'll be resolved
after some time when q->perturbation (its part of hash input) is reseeded.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists