netdev - Re: Weird TCP hang when doing loopback NFS (wireshark traces attached)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:58:01 -0500
From:	Bruce James Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Cc:	Linux Network Devel Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Weird TCP hang when doing loopback NFS (wireshark traces
 attached)

On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 11:31:31PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Bruce James Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:52:28PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >>> Hi Bruce,
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Trond Myklebust
> >>> <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > When doing testing of NFSv3 loopback mounts (client and server are on
> >>> > the same IP address), I'm seeing a very reproducible hang in which the
> >>> > client stops receiving data from the server. The TCP connection is still
> >>> > marked as established, and the server appears to continue to receive and
> >>> > send data, however the client does not.
> >>> >
> >>> > So far, I've reproduced on both v4.0-rc1, and the Fedora v3.18.7 kernel.
> >>> >
> >>> > The reproducer is simply to loopback mount using NFSv3, and then run the
> >>> > 'fsx' filesystem exerciser. I'm usually able to trigger the hang with
> >>> > "fsx -N 100000 foobar".
> >>> >
> >>> > I've attached a couple of wireshark trace of a few frames just before
> >>> > and during the hang in case it jogs any memories.
> >>>
> >>> This bug appears to go away when I disable the splice()-based reads by
> >>> clearing the RQ_SPLICE_OK flag.
> >>>
> >>> I noticed that it always involved a combination of a READ and a
> >>> truncating SETATTR call. Are you sure that it is safe to share
> >>> pagecache pages directly with sendpage() in this way? As far as I can
> >>> tell, there is no locking to prevent them from being modified while in
> >>> the TCP send queue.
> >>
> >> This is the stable-pages problem that we've had forever, isn't it?  Or
> >> is this a different problem?
> >
> > It is causing the TCP socket to hang, so it goes beyond the usual
> > stable pages issue.
> >
> 
> Confirming that clearing RQ_SPLICE_OK fixes the issue on all kernel
> that I've tested so far.

Well, if the problem is a race with truncate then I guess it may have
something to do with sending pages that are no longer part of the page
cache?

I'd think that the get_page() in nfsd_splice_actor would prevent the
page being put to any other use until the network layer was done with
it, so that at worst the client would see garbage.  But I don't begin to
understand how truncation actually works....

The zero-copy v3 code has been there since 2002, if I'm reading the
history right, so if it's really a fundamental problem with the approach
then I wonder how it's survived so long.

I haven't tried to reproduce yet.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html